27.07.10
PEOPLE v. KNIGHT
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
MICHAEL DAVID KNIGHT, Defendant and Appellant.
No. A125579.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.
Filed July 26, 2010.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTSMcGUINESS, P.J.
Appellant Michael David Knight appeals his conviction for vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. (c)(1)), arguing that the trial court erred by refusing to give the jury instructions on how to evaluate circumstantial evidence. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUNDOn June 11, 2008, at about 5:00 p.m., Patricia Dellabruna was driving south in a pickup truck on Petaluma Hill Road, a two-lane road. It was a clear, dry day. Traffic was flowing steadily, with vehicles on the road traveling "around 40, 50 miles an hour." Ahead of her, Dellabruna saw a motorcycle driven by a male followed by a tan sedan with a male driver and a female passenger. John Gauthier was driving the motorcycle and appellant was driving the sedan.
Source: Leagle.com
www.GetInsuranceFacts.com Shopping for a car insurance student policy? Here are the top insurance myths we have heard! No Fault insurance means no ...
|
Proposal would eliminate ZIP codes as factor in Wisconsin car ... Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - Sep 24, 2009
My bill will make sure that auto insurance premiums will be based upon the driver's record, the years of experience a driver has behind the wheel, and more »
|
|
Rolling Sculpture Beats Gold as Values of Collector Cars Soar Bloomberg - Sep 25, 2009
Television has helped fuel today's market boom, said Ford Heacock III, president of Heacock Classic, a collector-car insurance company.
|
|
Five people face their own health care crises Baxter Bulletin - Sep 25, 2009
His health care comes from a free clinic for the poor. Bruce's fall began nearly 25 years ago, in 1985. After 15 years working for Disney, mcdonald's and and more »
|
|
Grading the Baucus Health Plan New York Times - Sep 16, 2009
|
|
Slash Your Insurance Costs Kiplinger.com - Sep 23, 2009
If your car is five years old or older, you may be paying more in premiums than you could possibly get back in claims. Consider dropping collision and and more »
|
|
|